Alvid Scriptorium ← all publications
Tier I — Publication

A Shared Curriculum Across the Sectarian Line: Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī's Tajrīd al-ʿAqāʾid in Shia and Sunni Madrasas

Saad Khizar Bosal SSRN — in preparation verification pass complete
Abstract Tajrīd al-ʿAqāʾid ("The Catharsis of Beliefs"), composed by the Twelver Shia philosopher and statesman Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (d. 1274), is one of the more striking cases of a single text becoming foundational reading on both sides of the Sunni–Shia divide. Within a generation of al-Ṭūsī's death, his student al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī had written the commentary that would anchor the text in the Twelver Shia hawza curriculum for centuries. Independently, a Sunni commentary tradition grew up around the same base text — most influentially through ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Qūshjī's commentary — and became a standard part of advanced theological training in Ottoman and later Mughal-Indian madrasas. This paper sets out what is solidly documented about that dual transmission, corrects a specific but widely repeated error in how al-Qūshjī's move to Ottoman territory is usually told, and closes with a short interpretive section situating the case within a broader argument about parallel institutional structures in Islamic intellectual history.

1. The text and its author

Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (1201–1274) was a Twelver Shia philosopher, theologian, and scientist who served the Ilkhanid court and founded the Marāgha observatory. His Tajrīd al-ʿAqāʾid recast Islamic theology (kalām) in the technical vocabulary of Avicennian philosophy — substance and accident, necessary and contingent being, cause and effect — applying that apparatus to the standard topics of Islamic doctrine: God's existence and attributes, prophecy, the imamate, and resurrection. Its terse, condensed style made it a demanding but efficient teaching text, well suited to a commentary tradition built around unpacking its compressed arguments.

2. Two independent commentary traditions

The Shia hawza tradition. Al-Ṭūsī's own student, al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 1325), wrote Kashf al-Murād fī Sharḥ Tajrīd al-Iʿtiqād, a line-by-line commentary that became a standard text in Twelver Shia seminaries. Modern critical editions of Kashf al-Murād exist and are independently catalogued — notably the edition critically edited and annotated by the contemporary Qom scholar Ḥasan Ḥasanzādeh Āmulī, published by the Society of Teachers (Jāmiʿat al-Mudarrisīn) in Qom in 1407 AH/1986 CE, and separately catalogued in international library systems. The commentary's continued use in Shia seminary curricula from Hilla and Najaf through Safavid Isfahan to the present-day hawza of Qom is well established in the scholarly literature on Twelver religious education.

The Sunni imperial tradition. A separate, later commentary — al-Sharḥ al-Jadīd ("The New Commentary"), by the astronomer and theologian ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Qūshjī (d. 1474) — became the standard vehicle for teaching al-Ṭūsī's text in Sunni institutions. Al-Qūshjī's commentary was read in the Ottoman Ṣaḥn-ı Semān madrasas of Istanbul and, through the Dars-i Niẓāmī curriculum established in eighteenth-century Mughal India at Firangi Mahal (Lucknow), remained part of advanced Sunni theological training into the modern period, alongside the glosses of Mīr Sayyid Sharīf al-Jurjānī and Jalāl al-Dīn al-Dawānī.

The result is a genuine and well-documented case: a text by an "unapologetic" Twelver Shia author, engaging arguments for the Shia doctrine of the imamate in its own chapters, nonetheless became required reading — via a Sunni commentator's engagement with and rebuttal of those same chapters — in the Ottoman and Mughal institutions that trained Sunni judges and jurists. Neither tradition erased the other's reading of the text; the same base text supported two independent, mutually aware commentary traditions that disagreed about its most contested chapter (on the imamate) while sharing its metaphysical apparatus.

3. A correction: how al-Qūshjī actually reached Ottoman territory

A detail that recurs in popular retellings of this story — that Sultan Mehmed II personally dispatched an embassy to fetch al-Qūshjī to Istanbul, with a lavish daily stipend attached — does not hold up against the standard biographical accounts. Al-Qūshjī left Samarkand and traveled west around 1470 as a delegate sent by the Aq Qoyunlu ruler Uzun Ḥasan to the court of Mehmed II; he chose to remain in Ottoman territory afterward because of Mehmed's patronage of scholars, rather than being recruited there directly by an Ottoman mission sent to retrieve him. No independent source could be found for a specific "200 gold ducats" daily stipend, and it should not be repeated without a primary citation. The underlying fact that al-Qūshjī came to enjoy Mehmed II's patronage and became a leading professor in the new Istanbul madrasa system is well documented; the more dramatic embassy narrative is not, and this paper does not repeat it.

4. A note on interpretation

The account above is, I think, defensible to a specialist as it stands. What follows is my own reading: I take the Tajrīd's dual afterlife as a clear case of what I elsewhere call parallel institutional structures — a single body of technical philosophical theology serving as shared infrastructure across a doctrinal line that, on its most contested question (the imamate), the two traditions never actually agreed on. It doesn't show that Sunni and Shia theology converge; if anything, the commentary tradition on Maqṣad 5 (the imamate chapter) shows precisely where and how they diverge, using the same technical vocabulary to reach opposite conclusions. What it shows, I think, is that a shared philosophical infrastructure and genuine doctrinal disagreement are not mutually exclusive — a point I think is more interesting, and more historically accurate, than either a story of trans-sectarian harmony or one of sealed, mutually unintelligible traditions.

Bibliography

  1. Ḥasan ibn Yūsuf al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī, Kashf al-Murād fī Sharḥ Tajrīd al-Iʿtiqād, critical edition annotated by Ḥasan Ḥasanzādeh Āmulī (Qom: Jāmiʿat al-Mudarrisīn, 1407 AH/1986).
  2. Ali Qushji — biographical entry, MacTutor History of Mathematics (University of St Andrews).
  3. Ali Qushji — Wikipedia (used for corroborating the Uzun Ḥasan embassy route; a primary or peer-reviewed biography should replace this citation before formal submission).
  4. Francis Robinson, The ʿUlama of Farangi Mahall and Islamic Culture in South Asia (Ranikhet: Permanent Black, 2001) — background on the Dars-i Niẓāmī curriculum and Firangi Mahal.
  5. Sabine Schmidtke, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology — background on the kalām commentary tradition generally (specific chapter to be identified before submission).
Editorial note This draft replaces an earlier two-file version of this material. Corrected: the Qūshjī–Mehmed II arrival narrative (§3), per independent biographical sourcing — the "royal embassy" and "200 gold ducats" details are dropped. Removed entirely: specific manuscript counts claimed for three named archives, none of which could be independently verified against any library catalog. The Kashf al-Murād edition citation has been corrected to the independently confirmed 1407 AH/1986 Qom edition, replacing an uncorroborated citation in the source material. A claimed 1996 Alexandria edition of the base Tajrīd al-ʿAqāʾid text could not be independently located and has been dropped rather than cited unverified. Before SSRN submission: source a proper academic citation for the Uzun Ḥasan embassy account, and confirm the Firangi Mahal citation against Robinson's book directly.